The Supreme Court refused to hear the American Civil Liberties Union’s challenge to the NSA’s warrantless wiretap program. As anticipated, the Courts continued with their previous position that the ACLU’s suit had legs that wouldn’t walk because the plaintiffs (the ACLU, other lawyers, scholars, and reporters) could not prove that they had been wiretapped by the NSA.
“It’s very disturbing that the president’s actions will go unremarked
upon by the court,” said Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU’s national
security project. “In our view, it shouldn’t be left to executive
branch officials alone to determine the limits.”
The ACLU clearly points out that the situations is a catch-22. On the one hand, the Court makes it plain that a person would need firm proof that they were being surveilled without a warrant, yet this very information protected from public knowledge because of the carte blanch powers relinquished to Bush through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The activity is said to be part of the Terrorist Surveillance Program, which no longer exists.
For some reason, it’s not easy to find articles covering this topic. Here’s one.
Read the ACLU’s Press Release.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Posted in activists, history, it is what it is, what is we gon do
Recent Comments